This chapter critiques the modern "one meaning" approach to biblical interpretation, which relies heavily on historical-critical methods to uncover an author's original intent, arguing instead for a "many meanings" framework rooted in pre-critical church history. The author contends that for fifteen centuries, early church fathers and medieval theologians embraced multiple layers of textual meaning because they viewed God as an active Divine Author rather than limiting Scripture to a fixed human context. By introducing a hybrid "one divine pattern of meaning/many meanings" theory, the chapter demonstrates how a single overarching principle can yield valid cultural applications across diverse global communities without descending into absolute relativism. Ultimately, the purpose of the chapter is to empower cross-cultural biblical engagement, or ethnohermeneutics, by liberating Scripture from rigid academic restrictions and recognizing the infinite relevance of God's Word for every generation and culture.